<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fun With Mint 02022007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lofitribe.com/2007/02/02/fun-with-mint-02022007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lofitribe.com/2007/02/02/fun-with-mint-02022007/</link>
	<description>A virtual notebook of Christian expression, journey, and study.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.lofitribe.com/2007/02/02/fun-with-mint-02022007/#comment-2547</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lofitribe.com/2007/02/02/fun-with-mint-02022007/#comment-2547</guid>
		<description>100% correct, Robin. Liberal theology is an attempt at a weak sell of humanism wrapped in Christian (at least in the USA context) terminology, symbolism and sometimes even ritual. It's literally mind-boggling, when critically looked at in a honest sort of way. I am especially tickled when I happen onto a pack of liberal theology espousers who are blatantly mimicking - or imitating - the methodology of what I would call orthodox Christianity. It happens day in and day out here in the US.

I once asked a few liberal ministers, during my time in Clinical Pastoral Education (emergency ward, trauma, decedent care), for advice re: the lack of content liberal religion &#38; theology seemed to possess when faced with the serious situations in a hospital setting. Do you know what these ministers told me to do? They told me to pretend I was a Christian (I actually was a Christian, albeit a goofy liberal one, but they apparently didn't realize as much yet). They actually told me to use the Christian theology and message. I am not kidding! Soon after this wonderful advice was given, I left liberal theology and liberal Christianity behind ... where it belongs. The Gospel of Christ is sufficient as is (Biblically speaking).

I have many. many other stories I collected along the way. All of them pretty much paint liberal theology as an intellectual exercise in humanism that finds what little practical expression it has in a thin imitation of Christian methodology and practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100% correct, Robin. Liberal theology is an attempt at a weak sell of humanism wrapped in Christian (at least in the USA context) terminology, symbolism and sometimes even ritual. It&#8217;s literally mind-boggling, when critically looked at in a honest sort of way. I am especially tickled when I happen onto a pack of liberal theology espousers who are blatantly mimicking - or imitating - the methodology of what I would call orthodox Christianity. It happens day in and day out here in the US.</p>
<p>I once asked a few liberal ministers, during my time in Clinical Pastoral Education (emergency ward, trauma, decedent care), for advice re: the lack of content liberal religion &amp; theology seemed to possess when faced with the serious situations in a hospital setting. Do you know what these ministers told me to do? They told me to pretend I was a Christian (I actually was a Christian, albeit a goofy liberal one, but they apparently didn&#8217;t realize as much yet). They actually told me to use the Christian theology and message. I am not kidding! Soon after this wonderful advice was given, I left liberal theology and liberal Christianity behind &#8230; where it belongs. The Gospel of Christ is sufficient as is (Biblically speaking).</p>
<p>I have many. many other stories I collected along the way. All of them pretty much paint liberal theology as an intellectual exercise in humanism that finds what little practical expression it has in a thin imitation of Christian methodology and practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Emerson Avenger</title>
		<link>http://www.lofitribe.com/2007/02/02/fun-with-mint-02022007/#comment-2544</link>
		<dc:creator>The Emerson Avenger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lofitribe.com/2007/02/02/fun-with-mint-02022007/#comment-2544</guid>
		<description>I think that one of the major problems with â€œliberal theologyâ€, particularly within the context of the U*U â€œreligious communityâ€, is that God is left out of the equation. A lot of so called liberal â€œtheologyâ€ isnâ€™t theology at all because it has virtually nothing to do with God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that one of the major problems with â€œliberal theologyâ€, particularly within the context of the U*U â€œreligious communityâ€, is that God is left out of the equation. A lot of so called liberal â€œtheologyâ€ isnâ€™t theology at all because it has virtually nothing to do with God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
