<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Unchurched Prefer Sacred Spaces Over Common Spaces</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lofitribe.com/2008/04/24/the-unchurched-prefer-sacred-spaces-over-common-spaces/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lofitribe.com/2008/04/24/the-unchurched-prefer-sacred-spaces-over-common-spaces/</link>
	<description>A virtual notebook of Christian expression, journey, and study.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mak</title>
		<link>http://www.lofitribe.com/2008/04/24/the-unchurched-prefer-sacred-spaces-over-common-spaces/#comment-17568</link>
		<dc:creator>Mak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 00:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lofitribe.com/?p=1025#comment-17568</guid>
		<description>Adam - hehe...that was pretty much my point about how all of this is hypothetical.

Shawn - I can see how you would get that from that statement but in my head that's not what I was getting at...didn't you crawl in my head? how silly of you ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam - hehe&#8230;that was pretty much my point about how all of this is hypothetical.</p>
<p>Shawn - I can see how you would get that from that statement but in my head that&#8217;s not what I was getting at&#8230;didn&#8217;t you crawl in my head? how silly of you ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.lofitribe.com/2008/04/24/the-unchurched-prefer-sacred-spaces-over-common-spaces/#comment-17566</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lofitribe.com/?p=1025#comment-17566</guid>
		<description>Interesting that this is about "people who don't go to church."  They prefer sacred spaces over common spaces but ultimately they most prefer to stay home!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that this is about &#8220;people who don&#8217;t go to church.&#8221;  They prefer sacred spaces over common spaces but ultimately they most prefer to stay home!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.lofitribe.com/2008/04/24/the-unchurched-prefer-sacred-spaces-over-common-spaces/#comment-17563</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lofitribe.com/?p=1025#comment-17563</guid>
		<description>@sagely: Sorry! I just rescued your comment from the spam dungeon! You make a good point about "sweeping anthropological statements!" Great thoughts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sagely: Sorry! I just rescued your comment from the spam dungeon! You make a good point about &#8220;sweeping anthropological statements!&#8221; Great thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.lofitribe.com/2008/04/24/the-unchurched-prefer-sacred-spaces-over-common-spaces/#comment-17562</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lofitribe.com/?p=1025#comment-17562</guid>
		<description>We'll to be honest, I did assume as much, given your emergent expression/context. :)

But you also wrote, "Because we're not supposed to be doing stuff to get the unchurched to come to us - period."

That reads like a pretty hard break away from anything attractional.

Beyond this issue, I think we are talking the same language, Mak. I also get a kick of how many words and phrases you and I put between quotes! LOL!

Rock on, Mak!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll to be honest, I did assume as much, given your emergent expression/context. :)</p>
<p>But you also wrote, &#8220;Because we&#8217;re not supposed to be doing stuff to get the unchurched to come to us - period.&#8221;</p>
<p>That reads like a pretty hard break away from anything attractional.</p>
<p>Beyond this issue, I think we are talking the same language, Mak. I also get a kick of how many words and phrases you and I put between quotes! LOL!</p>
<p>Rock on, Mak!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mak</title>
		<link>http://www.lofitribe.com/2008/04/24/the-unchurched-prefer-sacred-spaces-over-common-spaces/#comment-17561</link>
		<dc:creator>Mak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lofitribe.com/?p=1025#comment-17561</guid>
		<description>I don't disagree - I'm not sure where you'd get the idea that I don't think attraction plays a role at all. Maybe you're assuming that because of my context.

I agree that there needs to be a bit of both - but I'm not talking about ecclesiology so much as missiology and in our missiology, our primary understanding should be from the command to go. 

Clearly, we have to have a safe, "attractive" community where we can "bring to" and we should also be "attractive" people, but if our missiology is first attractional, we're going to get into big time problems as we've seen in the past 10-20 years</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t disagree - I&#8217;m not sure where you&#8217;d get the idea that I don&#8217;t think attraction plays a role at all. Maybe you&#8217;re assuming that because of my context.</p>
<p>I agree that there needs to be a bit of both - but I&#8217;m not talking about ecclesiology so much as missiology and in our missiology, our primary understanding should be from the command to go. </p>
<p>Clearly, we have to have a safe, &#8220;attractive&#8221; community where we can &#8220;bring to&#8221; and we should also be &#8220;attractive&#8221; people, but if our missiology is first attractional, we&#8217;re going to get into big time problems as we&#8217;ve seen in the past 10-20 years</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.lofitribe.com/2008/04/24/the-unchurched-prefer-sacred-spaces-over-common-spaces/#comment-17559</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lofitribe.com/?p=1025#comment-17559</guid>
		<description>... one more thing (I have to stop hitting "Post Comment" to quickly!):

I get what your are saying about incarnational mission. I excpect you to preach that from your emergent perspective. I don't think, however, that it is holistic, at least by itself. I think ministry in any context requires a well balanced expression of incarnation and attraction. It's just how it is. In fact, if I were to push this conversation to the extreme, I'd say that large aspects of incarnational philosophy are inherently attractional in scope. Make sense? The NT is full of examples of incarnational and attractional mission. I personally want to sail between both while making sure whatever it is people are attracted to is honest and based in kingdom values.

I digress ... but you raise so many good points in your comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; one more thing (I have to stop hitting &#8220;Post Comment&#8221; to quickly!):</p>
<p>I get what your are saying about incarnational mission. I excpect you to preach that from your emergent perspective. I don&#8217;t think, however, that it is holistic, at least by itself. I think ministry in any context requires a well balanced expression of incarnation and attraction. It&#8217;s just how it is. In fact, if I were to push this conversation to the extreme, I&#8217;d say that large aspects of incarnational philosophy are inherently attractional in scope. Make sense? The NT is full of examples of incarnational and attractional mission. I personally want to sail between both while making sure whatever it is people are attracted to is honest and based in kingdom values.</p>
<p>I digress &#8230; but you raise so many good points in your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.lofitribe.com/2008/04/24/the-unchurched-prefer-sacred-spaces-over-common-spaces/#comment-17558</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lofitribe.com/?p=1025#comment-17558</guid>
		<description>Right on, Mak. I think you nailed in that 3rd paragraph. Right now, we are meeting in an art gallery. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on, Mak. I think you nailed in that 3rd paragraph. Right now, we are meeting in an art gallery. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mak</title>
		<link>http://www.lofitribe.com/2008/04/24/the-unchurched-prefer-sacred-spaces-over-common-spaces/#comment-17557</link>
		<dc:creator>Mak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lofitribe.com/?p=1025#comment-17557</guid>
		<description>of course the nt does :) I'm talking about NOW friend. I hear WAAAYY too much talk about doing this that or the other thing to get in the unchurched when in reality, it's not happening. Because we're not supposed to be doing stuff to get the unchurched to come to us - period. and even in the NT, Jesus and later the early church was living life well amongst everyone else AND they didn't have midievil architecture ;)

I think we can create sacred space anywhere. My guess is that the unchurched generally don't experience sacred space in any context but in a cathedral it at least feels more sacred automatically. 

If we learn anything from this it's that the human soul years for something set apart, something sacred...which doesn't necessarily need to be a cathedral.

I also think this is societally conditioned in our culture.

I personally much prefer something more "classically sacred looking" but a coffee shop basement is what we've got and we are cognizant of making it a sacred space in the way we live and love in that space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course the nt does :) I&#8217;m talking about NOW friend. I hear WAAAYY too much talk about doing this that or the other thing to get in the unchurched when in reality, it&#8217;s not happening. Because we&#8217;re not supposed to be doing stuff to get the unchurched to come to us - period. and even in the NT, Jesus and later the early church was living life well amongst everyone else AND they didn&#8217;t have midievil architecture ;)</p>
<p>I think we can create sacred space anywhere. My guess is that the unchurched generally don&#8217;t experience sacred space in any context but in a cathedral it at least feels more sacred automatically. </p>
<p>If we learn anything from this it&#8217;s that the human soul years for something set apart, something sacred&#8230;which doesn&#8217;t necessarily need to be a cathedral.</p>
<p>I also think this is societally conditioned in our culture.</p>
<p>I personally much prefer something more &#8220;classically sacred looking&#8221; but a coffee shop basement is what we&#8217;ve got and we are cognizant of making it a sacred space in the way we live and love in that space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.lofitribe.com/2008/04/24/the-unchurched-prefer-sacred-spaces-over-common-spaces/#comment-17556</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lofitribe.com/?p=1025#comment-17556</guid>
		<description>... which is just to say that maybe we can listen and learn something.

I hear you and honestly hope this study doesn't result in a bunch of new building projects that are themed around medieval architecture! I can see that happening too! It would be a parody of monumental proportions!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; which is just to say that maybe we can listen and learn something.</p>
<p>I hear you and honestly hope this study doesn&#8217;t result in a bunch of new building projects that are themed around medieval architecture! I can see that happening too! It would be a parody of monumental proportions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.lofitribe.com/2008/04/24/the-unchurched-prefer-sacred-spaces-over-common-spaces/#comment-17555</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lofitribe.com/?p=1025#comment-17555</guid>
		<description>@Mak: Well, the NT has a few examples ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mak: Well, the NT has a few examples &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
